Many interpreters have regarded the Parmenides as a 'reductio ad absurdum' of the Eleatic philosophy. But would Plato have been likely to place this in the mouth of the great Parmenides himself, who appeared to him, in Homeric language, to be 'venerable and awful, ' and to have a 'glorious depth of mind'? (Theaet.). It may be admitted that he has ascribed to an Eleatic stranger in the Sophist opinions which went beyond the doctrines of the Eleatics. But the Eleatic stranger expressly criticises the doctrines in which he had been brought up; he admits that he is going to 'lay hands on his father Parmenides.' Nothing of this kind is said of Zeno and Parmenides. How then, without a word of explanation, could Plato assign to them the refutation of their own tenets? The conclusion at which we must arrive is that the Parmenides is not a refutation of the Eleatic philosophy. Nor would such an explanation afford any satisfactory connexion of the first and second parts of the dialogue. And it is quite inconsistent with Plato's own relation to the Eleatics;

Media	Books Paperback Book (Book with soft cover and glued back)
Released	August 7, 2017
ISBN13	9781973855361
Publishers	Createspace Independent Publishing Platf
Pages	106
Dimensions	152 × 229 × 6 mm · 154 g
Language	English

Show all

More by Plato

Others have also bought

More from this series

See all of Plato ( e.g. Paperback Book , Hardcover Book , Book , CD and Book pack )